Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Frank Stoffels, et al v. SBC Communications, Inc., et al
as 12-50688
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK STOFFELS, on Behalf of the SBC Telephone Concession Plan and All Other Persons Similarly Situated, LINDA VILLAFANE, on behalf of the SBC Telephone Concession Plan and all other persons similarly situated, JAMES BELCHER, on behalf of the SBC Concession Plan and all other persons similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SBC COMMUNICATIONS, INC., SBC TELEPHONE CONCESSION PLAN and A T, formerly known as SBC Communications, Inc.
Frank Stoffels, et al v. SBC Communications, Inc., et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 11-50148
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK STOFFELS, on Behalf of the SBC Telephone Concession Plan and All Other Persons Similarly Situated, JAMES BELCHER, on Behalf of the SBC Concession Plan and All Other Persons Similarly Situated, BURNIE JOE DUNN, on Behalf of the SBC Concession Plan and All Other Persons Similarly Situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SBC COMMUNICATIONS, INC., SBC TELEPHONE CONCESSION PLAN and AT&T, formerly known as SBC Communications, Inc.
Budget Prepay, Inc., et al v. AT&T Corp, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 09-11188
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BUDGET PREPAY, INC., GLOBAL CONNECTION INCORPORATED OF AMERICA, NEXUS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
AT&T CORP., formerly known as SBC Communications, Inc./AT&T Inc., ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, doing business as SBC Illinois, INDIANA BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC., doing business as SBC Indiana and others
Budget Prepay, Inc., et al v. AT&T Corp., et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 09-11099
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BUDGET PREPAY, INC., GLOBAL CONNECTION INCORPORATED OF AMERICA, NEXUS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
AT&T CORP., formerly known as SBC Communications, Inc./AT&T Inc., AT&T SOUTHEAST, INC., formerly known as BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, doing business as SBC Illinois and others
Kathleen Stewart v. AT&T, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 09-50892
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KATHLEEN A. STEWART, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant - Appellee:
AT&T, formerly known as SBC Communications Inc and AT&T PENSION BENEFIT PLAN-NON BARGAINED PROGRAM, formerly known as SBC Pension Benefit Plan and SBC Pension Benefit Plan-NonBargained Program
Archie Williams v. AT&T, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 09-20231
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARCHIE L WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
AT&T, formerly SBC Communications Inc, SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE LP, now known as Southwestern Bell Telephone Company of Texas, EDWARD E WHITACRE, JR., in His Official Capacity as Chairman and CEO of AT&T Inc and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-10258
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Aguirre, et al v. SBC Comm Inc, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 08-20042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YOLANDA M AGUIRRE, ANA M MORRIS, CORINA RAMOS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SBC COMMUNICATIONS INC, SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO and SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE LP
Hernandez v. SBC Comm Inc
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 07-50687
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IRENE HERNANDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SBC COMMUNICATIONS INC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.