Cases 1 - 10 of 74
USA v. Wagner
as 22-60599
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jasper Michael Wagner
Duarte v. Officials Warden Assist
as 22-50779
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Richard F. Duarte, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Officials Warden Assist., Reginald Smith, Medical Department, Room #4, Cyril Onyemechi, Mid Level Practitioner and others
Wanzer v. Rayford
as 22-50163
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jerry Wanzer
Defendant / Appellee:
Phonso J. Rayford, Senior Warden, John B. Connally Unit, sued in their individual and official capacity, John A. Marcum, Asst. Warden, John B. Connally Unit, sued in their individual and official capacity, Frank Stengel and others
Wagner v. Martin
as 22-10237
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mitchell Wagner
Defendant / Appellee:
Robert Martin, Unit Doctor, Jackie Gregory, Nurse Practitioner and Thomas Stewardson, Dentist
Jones v. Wagner
as 21-51122
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cory K. Jones
Defendant / Appellee:
Pamela Wagner, Mid-Level Practitioner, John B. Connally Unit
USA v. Wagner
as 21-40443
Defendant / Appellant:
Floyd Daril Wagner
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Jerry Wanzer v. Phonso Rayford, et al
as 20-50668
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU Stengel, Assistant Warden, John B. Connally Unit, sued in their individual and official capacity, FNU Alexander, Captain, John D. Connally Unit, sued in their individual and official capacity, FNU Rodas, Lieutenant, John B. Connally Unit, sued in their individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jerry Wanzer
USA v. Floyd Wagner
as 20-40486
Defendant / Appellant:
Floyd Daril Wagner
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Robert Davila v. Southwestern Corrections, et al
as 20-50574
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER R. PYLES, NURSE FNU WAGNER, SOUTHWESTERN CORRECTIONS, doing business as LaSalle Corrections and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT DAVILA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
