Cases 31 - 40 of 788
6101 Tullis Drive, LLC v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Insurance Company, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2023cv07066
Plaintiff:
6101 Tullis Drive, LLC
Defendant:
Interstate Fire & Casualty Insurance Company, Independent Specialty Insurance Company, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS OF LONDON - SYNDICATE 2357 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Knowles v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London (Lloyds of London)
as 2:2023cv07263
Plaintiff:
Clayton Knowles
Defendant:
Underwriters at Lloyd's, London (Lloyds of London)
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Claudel v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
as 2:2023cv07184
Plaintiff:
Margaret Melissa Glenn Claudel
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London and Chubb European Group SE
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Hamide v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London
as 2:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Abdulrahman Hamide
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Subscribing to Policy No. 141NORL0761 and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Alcoser et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, et al
as 2:2023cv07389
Plaintiff:
Linna Bowman Alcoser and Antonio A. Alcoser, Jr.
Defendant:
Convex Insurance Uk Limited, Certain Underwriters LLoyd's London and Convex UK LMT
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Gaidry & Thompson Properties, LLC v. Independent Specialty Insurance Company et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2023cv06864
Plaintiff:
Gaidry Thompson Properties, LLC
Defendant:
Independent Specialty Insurance Company, Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London and Other Insurers Subscribing to Binding Authority No. B604510568622021 and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
Counter Defendant:
Gaidry & Thompson Properties, LLC
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0205 - Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
Robertson v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, London et al
as 2:2023cv07387
Plaintiff:
Anika Robertson
Defendant:
Underwriters at Lloyd's, London and Chubb European Group SE
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jeansonne et al v. Velocity Risk Underwriters, LLC et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2023cv07198
Plaintiff:
Earl Jeansonne, Shirley Jeansonne, The Jeansonne Apartments LLC d/b/a The 121 Athenia Apartments and others
Defendant:
Velocity Risk Underwriters, LLC, Independent Specialty Insurance Company, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London and Other Insurers Subscribing to Binding Authority B60451056822021 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
QYMA Enterprise LLC v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London
as 2:2023cv07388
Plaintiff:
QYMA Enterprise LLC
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Nguyen v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
as 2:2023cv07371
Plaintiff:
Oanh Nguyen
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London subscribing to Certificate Number ALP695041 and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.