Cases 61 - 70 of 1,498
Denson v. Marshall County Correctional Facility
as 4:2022cv00194
Petitioner:
Christopher O. Denson
Respondent:
Marshall County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Belk et al
as 3:2022cv00278
Petitioner:
Carlos D. Moore
Respondent:
Jeffery B. Belk, Nathan Burl Cain, MDOC Records Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Cain et al
as 4:2022cv00191
Petitioner:
Bildrick Jackson
Respondent:
Burl Cain and The Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2022cv00273
Petitioner:
Larry Lewis
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tallant v. Smith
as 1:2022cv00192
Petitioner:
John Harley Tallant
Respondent:
Brandon Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Loden
as 4:2022cv00184
Petitioner:
Russell K. Hill
Respondent:
Warden C. Loden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lynch v. State of Mississippi
as 4:2022cv00181
Petitioner:
Leroy Lynch
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winters, Jr v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2022cv00256
Petitioner:
Clinton S. Winters, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Loden
as 4:2022cv00159
Petitioner:
Russell K. Hill
Respondent:
Warden C. Loden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Berryman v. Cain et al
as 1:2022cv00140
Petitioner:
Brian Scott Berryman
Respondent:
Burl Cain and Mississippi Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.