Cases 101 - 110 of 1,649
Hamp, Jr. v. Cain et al
as 3:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Brymon Hamp, Jr.
Defendant:
Nathan Burl Cain, Timothy Morris, Dr. James Glisson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilburn v. Cain et al
as 4:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Reggie Wilburn
Defendant:
Burl Cain, Donald Faucett, Timothy J. Donovan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Golliday et al
as 4:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Coby Cook
Defendant:
Rosie Golliday and Ora Starks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris v. Williams et al
as 3:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Rinaldo Eugene Norris
Defendant:
Jessie Williams, Bobby Tyler, Kimberly Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Collier et al
as 4:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Dean C. Boyd
Defendant:
Dewayne Collier and C.N.A. Reginald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardner v. Mississippi State Parole Board et al
as 4:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Qieran Gardner
Defendant:
Mississippi State Parole Board and Steve Pickett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mack v. Sturdivant et al
as 4:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
James Lee Mack
Defendant:
Marylen Sturdivant, Timothy Morris, Lee Simon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Harmon v. Ms. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 4:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
DeMarcus Harmon
Defendant:
Ms. Dept. of Corrections, Vitalcore Health Strategies, M.D.O.C. Commissioner Burl Cain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Carroll v. Loden et al
as 3:2021cv00248
Plaintiff:
Wiley Zachary Carroll
Defendant:
Warden Loden and Ms. Barbra James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Baker v. Hall et al
as 4:2021cv00165
Plaintiff:
Charlie Baker
Defendant:
Pelicia Hall, Leather Williams, Lt. Plesent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
