Cases 51 - 60 of 103
Paselk v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 6:2016cv01383
Plaintiff:
Carol Paselk
Defendant:
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC , Michael Waldron, Peak Foreclosure Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
The State Of Texas v. Diruzzo
as 4:2016cv00822
Plaintiff:
The State Of Texas
Defendant:
Joseph Andrew Diruzzo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Liu v. Hopkins County et al
as 4:2016cv00694
Plaintiff:
Hao Liu
Defendant:
Hopkins County , City of Sulphur Springs and Unnamed Individual
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Diamond Consortium, Inc. v. Manookian
as 4:2016cv00094
Plaintiff:
Diamond Consortium, Inc.
Defendant:
Brian Manookian
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Sevier v. Blackberry Limited
as 2:2016cv00040
Plaintiff:
Chris Sevier
Defendant:
Blackberry Limited
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
WILLIAMS v. Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 6:2015cv00862
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E WILLIAMS
Defendant:
Environmental Protection Agency, Gina McCarthy, Matthew McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Clasen v. National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00625
Plaintiff:
Robert Jonathan Clasen
Defendant:
National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners, Inc. , Nova Southeastern University Health Professions Division and American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Flores v. United States Attorney General
as 9:2015cv00060
Plaintiff:
Eric Flores
Defendant:
United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jacquette v. J. Edgar Hoover Building
as 1:2014cv00667
Plaintiff:
James D Jacquette
Defendant:
J. Edgar Hoover Building
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hamilton v. Freeman et al
as 1:2014cv00592
Plaintiff:
Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant:
Antoine L Freeman, Joyce M Guy and Edward McCray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
