Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Garza v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Armando Garza
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Nelson et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 3:2021cv01507
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, Charles Lucas, Michael Soriano and others
Plaintiff:
Maria Nelson and Jose Roel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 4:2018cv00761
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, Unnamed Locomotive Engineer and Union Pacific Corporation
Plaintiff:
VIcky Cox, Michael /Cox, Jr., Michael W. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2018cv00045
Plaintiff:
Lawrence W Jackson
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Ruby et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2012cv00493
Plaintiff:
Richard G Ruby
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Reed et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2012cv01035
Plaintiff:
Billy W Reed , James S Amos , Lynn E Andrews and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Love et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2011cv03593
Plaintiff:
Dewey R Love , Morris E Davis , Donald L Baker and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Hill v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2010cv01111
Plaintiff:
Roger Hill
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Price v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2009cv01093
Plaintiff:
Louis Price
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Price v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2009cv00362
Plaintiff:
Louis Price
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
