Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Wesner v. Southall et al
as 3:2022cv00927
Plaintiff:
Mr. Charles Thomas Wesner, Jr. and Charles Thomas Wesner, Jr
Defendant:
Mark Southall, Principle Management Group, Inc., Associations, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Auger Drilling Inc et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2019cv01376
Defendant:
Dean Johnson, Karol Johnson and Dean Basil Johnson
Debtor:
Auger Drilling, Inc
Plaintiff:
Coyle Whitten, Auger Drilling Inc and W Coyle Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Whitten v. Cuckler MD et al
as 3:2017cv01880
Plaintiff:
Gregory Whitten
Defendant:
John Cuckler, Alabama Medical Consultants Inc, Biomet Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Draude et al v. Cuckler et al
as 3:2017cv01247
Plaintiff:
Karen Draude , Scott Eanes and Gregory Whitten
Defendant:
John Cuckler, Alabama Medical Consultants Inc, Biomet Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whitten v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00847
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Whitten
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv02798
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00203
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Whitten v. City of Dallas Police Department
as 3:2011cv00534
Plaintiff:
Donald Lee Whitten
Defendant:
City of Dallas Police Department, J. Sanderlin, David Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Whitten Foundation v. General Star Indemnity Company
as 3:2008mc00052
Plaintiff:
The Whitten Foundation
Defendant:
General Star Indemnity Company
Whitten v. James et al
as 7:2008cv00044
Plaintiff:
Eddie Ray Whitten
Defendant:
NFN James and Trent
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
