Cases 61 - 70 of 10,990
Nettles v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00980
Petitioner:
Donovan Nettles and Donavan Nettles
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alonso v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00968
Petitioner:
Ralph Ernest Alonso
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00996
Petitioner:
Derrick Lewis
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tate v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00902
Petitioner:
Marquis Valantee' Tate
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Profitt v. Hall et al
as 4:2024cv00928
Petitioner:
Amanda Profitt
Respondent:
Tanisha Hall and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Norton v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00979
Petitioner:
Joseph Hercules Norton
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Lumpkin DO NOT DOCKET IN 4:24cv903. CASE IS CONSOLIDATED UNDER 4:24cv899.
as 4:2024cv00903
Petitioner:
Robert C. Edwards
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Lumpkin DO NOT DOCKET IN 4:24cv904. CASE IS CONSOLIDATED UNDER 4:24cv899
as 4:2024cv00904
Petitioner:
Robert C. Edwards
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00907
Petitioner:
Robert C. Edwards
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00899
Petitioner:
Robert C. Edwards
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
