Cases 61 - 70 of 11,001
Davis v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01514
Petitioner:
Michael William Davis
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frankenfield v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01560
Petitioner:
Brian C Frankenfield
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillips v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01481
Petitioner:
Rymir Phillips
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Webb v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01502
Petitioner:
Everette Dale Webb
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
English v. The United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv01321
Petitioner:
James-Thomas English
Respondent:
The United States of America, Montgomery County Courthouse & the of Texas & U, U. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Campos v. Lumpkin
as 2:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
John Michael Campos
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Lumpkin DO NOT DOCKET. Case transferred to Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division.
as 4:2024cv01466
Petitioner:
Antoine Thomas
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mahoney v. Harris County et al
as 4:2024cv01473
Plaintiff:
Sierra Mahoney
Defendant:
Harris County, Harris County Sheriff's Office, Keep Separate Inmate Assailants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGee v. Dicky
as 4:2024cv01482
Petitioner:
JorCorey Deshawn McGee
Respondent:
Wayne Dicky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00804
Petitioner:
Matthew Thomas Jones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
