Cases 31 - 40 of 27,342
Mathews v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01755
Petitioner:
Mike Naoyuki Mathews
Respondent:
TDCJ, Director Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Valier v. The State of Texas et al
as 4:2024cv01819
Plaintiff:
Nkrumeh Lumumbavalier
Defendant:
The State of Texas and Kim K. Ogg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Texas City Police Officer et al
as 4:2024cv01758
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Stewart
Defendant:
Texas City Police Oficer and Texas City Police Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frankenfield v. Warden Washington et al
as 4:2024cv01817
Plaintiff:
Brian C Frankenfield
Defendant:
Warden Washington and O.I.G.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Tate v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01749
Petitioner:
Marquis Valantee Tate
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rector v. Director, TDCJ ***CASE TRANSFERRED TO SDTX, HOUSTON DIVISION***
as 4:2024cv01741
Plaintiff:
Lonnie H Rector, Jr
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garcia v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv01740
Plaintiff:
Andrew Garcia, Jr.
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles and Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Harris County Sheriff's Office
as 4:2024cv01818
Plaintiff:
Armando Williams
Defendant:
Harris County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wills v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; Do not docket in this case. File only in 2:17cr00390.
as 2:2024cv00112
Petitioner:
David Keith Wills
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
