Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Elam v. Ituah et al
as 3:2018cv00027
Plaintiff:
Darius Duron Elam
Defendant:
Folashade Ituah, Samuel Walker and Kelvin Goff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell et al vs Davis, et al
as 4:2017cv03647
Plaintiff:
Darius Mitchell, Joe Mitchell and Laura Mitchell
Defendant:
M. Roesler, Lt McCullough and Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell et al vs Davis, et al
as 3:2017cv00366
Plaintiff:
Darius Mitchell, Joe Mitchell and Laura Mitchell
Defendant:
M. Roesler, Lt McCullough and Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv02870
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Embry et al v. Gringo's Mexican Kitchen No. 1, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00276
Plaintiff:
Michael Embry , Gabriel Martinez , Joel Montemayor and others
Defendant:
Gringo's Mexican Kitchen No. 1, Inc. , Gringo's Mexican Kitchen No. 2, Inc., Gringo's Mexican Kitchen No. 3, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Epps et al v. Great White Pressure Control LLC
as 3:2012cv00374
Plaintiff:
Antoine Epps, Eduardo Gonzales, Andrew Kestner and others
Defendant:
Great White Pressure Control LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Vidaurri v. ESJ, LLC et al
as 4:2012cv03281
Plaintiff:
Darius Vidaurri
Defendant:
ESJ, LLC and Top Gun Security and Investigations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Elam v. Lykos
as 4:2011cv03274
Plaintiff:
Darius D. Elam
Defendant:
Patricia Lykos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elam v. Lykos;
as 3:2011cv00395
Plaintiff:
Darius D. Elam
Defendant:
Patricia Lykos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster v Gulfmark et al
as 3:2010cv00210
Plaintiff:
Darius Foster
Defendant:
Gulfmark Offshore Inc and Halliburton Energy Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
