Cases 91 - 100 of 7,594
Doyle v. Lumpkin
as 6:2023cv00824
Petitioner:
Rico Doyle
Respondent:
Warden Patrick Cooper and Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Longazel v. Lumpkin
as 6:2023cv00818
Petitioner:
Christopher John Longazel
Respondent:
Brian Collier and Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Longazel v. Lumpkin
as 6:2023cv00817
Petitioner:
Christopher John Longazel
Respondent:
Brian Collier and Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bates v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00430
Petitioner:
Bradley Bates
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Haskan v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00470
Petitioner:
Corwin Haskan
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Speir v. Warden FCI La Tuna Camp
as 3:2023cv00450
Petitioner:
Joshua Speir
Defendant:
Warden FCI La Tuna Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Graves v. Warden FCI La Tuna Camp
as 3:2023cv00462
Petitioner:
Ryan Graves
Respondent:
Warden FCI La Tuna Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burks v. Lumpkin
as 1:2023cv01468
Petitioner:
Bobby Ray Burks, Jr.
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tijerina v. Arnold S. Zwicke, Guadalupe County Sheriff
as 5:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
Jessica Ann Tijerina
Respondent:
Arnold S. Zwicke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martinez Zapata v. Warden FCI La Tuna - FBOP
as 3:2023cv00471
Petitioner:
Manuel Martinez Zapata
Respondent:
Warden FCI La Tuna - FBOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
