Cases 61 - 70 of 7,673
Cato v. Hays County, Villapando
as 5:2024cv00783
Respondent:
Hays County, Villapando
Petitioner:
Avery Cato
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wigley v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00839
Respondent:
Kevin B. Smith
Petitioner:
Troy Wigley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collier v. McNamara
as 6:2024cv00397
Petitioner:
Christopher Collier
Respondent:
Parnell McNamara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramirez v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00255
Respondent:
Cheron Y. Nash
Petitioner:
Jose Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramirez v. Warden FCI La Tuna-Camp
as 3:2024cv00254
Petitioner:
Moises Ramirez
Respondent:
Warden FCI La Tuna-Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Clark v. Warden S. Hijar
as 3:2024cv00212
Petitioner:
Jason W. Clark
Respondent:
Warden S. Hijar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lopez v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2024cv00227
Respondent:
K. Rodriguez, C.S. Peters and Sandra Hijar
Petitioner:
David Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pate v. Warden S. Hijar
as 3:2024cv00213
Respondent:
Warden S. Hijar
Petitioner:
Frank Edwin Pate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stanley v. Humphrey
as 7:2024cv00158
Petitioner:
Amer Stanley
Respondent:
Warden Chad Humphrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nobles v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00315
Petitioner:
Dennis Germaine Nobles
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
