Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Cases 21 - 30 of 19,635
Zarate v. Coger et al
as 5:2024cv00278
Plaintiff: Isaac Zarate
Defendant: Warden FNU Coger, Warden FNU Gould, Warden FNU Feazel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00479
Petitioner: Darren Tramell Hughes
Respondent: Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruff v. McCulloch et al
as 7:2024cv00118
Plaintiff: Malcolm D Ruff
Defendant: Robin McCulloch, Lori Hodgkins, Atticus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kindred v. Trevino
as 6:2024cv00244
Plaintiff: Herman Lee Kindred
Defendant: Gwendolyn Trevino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dennis v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00157
Plaintiff: Paris Lamont Dennis
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Kirksey v. Leseur et al
as 7:2024cv00119
Plaintiff: Anthony L Kirksey
Defendant: Chief FNU Leseur and C. Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trejo v. Unknown Defendants
as 5:2024cv00471
Plaintiff: Anthony Robert Trejo
Defendant: Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tunstall v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00495
Petitioner: Matthew Nelson Tunstall
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00491
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00492
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?