Cases 31 - 40 of 165
Duarte v. The State of Texas et al
as 5:2022cv00437
Petitioner:
Richard F. Duarte, Jr.
Respondent:
The State of Texas, Robert Mclore, Sharon Mcarae and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Estrada v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 5:2022cv00284
Petitioner:
Jose F. Estrada, III
Respondent:
U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Herrera v. State of Texas et al
as 5:2021cv01266
Plaintiff:
Francisco Herrera
Defendant:
State of Texas, Bexar County District Clerks, Bexar County District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibbs v. Collier et al
as 5:2021cv01259
Plaintiff:
Marcello LaCraig Gibbs
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Phonso J. Rayford, John A. Marcum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Seaton et al
as 5:2021cv00863
Plaintiff:
Kerwin Bryant
Defendant:
J. Seaton, J. Martin, C. Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calton v. Gutierrez et al
as 1:2021cv00846
Plaintiff:
Allen F. Calton
Defendant:
David G. Gutierrez, James La Favers, Carmella Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duarte v. Stengel et al
as 5:2021cv00885
Petitioner:
Richard F. Duarte, Jr.
Respondent:
Frank Stengel, State of Texas, Stephen Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Franke v. Cornish et al
as 1:2021cv00775
Plaintiff:
Mark Patrick Franke
Defendant:
A. Cornish, D. Perez, R. Kidd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Blevins et al
as 1:2021cv00697
Plaintiff:
Dale J. Richardson
Defendant:
Officer FNU Blevins, Officer FNU Jones, Immigration Control and Enforcement and others
Richardson v. Blevins et al
as 1:2021cv00794
Plaintiff:
Dale J. Richardson
Defendant:
Officer FNU Blevins, Officer FNU Jones, Immigration Control and Enforcement and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
