Cases 41 - 50 of 89
Fisher v. Campbell et al
as 1:2016cv00668
Defendant:
Carson Campbell, Michael Cassaredo and Trey Dunn
Plaintiff:
Rodrick O. Fisher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Davis
as 5:2016cv00469
Respondent:
Lorie L. Davis
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Michael O Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mack v. Fowler
as 6:2016cv00076
Defendant:
Officer Rick Fowler
Plaintiff:
Corey O. Mack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Dell v. Sifuentes
as 5:2016cv00318
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Kevin O'Dell
Respondent:
FNU Sifuentes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mack v. Wilson et al
as 6:2016cv00051
Defendant:
1st Shift Jailors and Staff and Sheriff Dennis Wilson
Plaintiff:
Corey O. Mack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mack v. Wilson et al
as 6:2016cv00048
Plaintiff:
Corey O. Mack
Defendant:
Tammy McCullen, Dr. FNU Rettig and Dennis Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mack v. Burkeen et al
as 6:2016cv00043
Defendant:
Daniel Burkeen and Dennis Wilson
Plaintiff:
Corey O. Mack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pineda v. O'Hare et al
as 5:2016cv00122
Respondent:
FNU Lacox and FNU O'Hare
Petitioner:
Charles Pineda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
O'Leary v. Kulow et al
as 1:2015cv01096
Defendant:
Sherriff Otto H. Haeneck, Sherriff Brad Kulow and Washington County Sherriff's Department
Plaintiff:
Brian Patrick O'Leary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Warden Mosby et al
as 7:2015cv00124
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Stephens, Medical Staff, Sgt Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Julian Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
