Cases 71 - 80 of 19,635
Gonzales v. Comal County et al
as 5:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Eric Nicholas Gonzales
Defendant:
Comal County, Sheriff Mark Reynolds, Joshua Swillinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mateo v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Lopez Mateo Mateo
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Zirus v. O'Daniel et al
as 1:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Scott Zirus
Defendant:
Patrick O'Daniel, Sydney Zuiker, Nate Spinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Abbott et al
as 1:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Juan J. Sanchez
Defendant:
Diana Cruz, M. Machado, Shirley W. Buttz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Licon v. Sheriff of Ector County
as 7:2024cv00105
Petitioner:
Jose Cruz Licon
Respondent:
Sheriff of Ector County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Boyd v. Harris et al
as 1:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Scott W. Boyd
Defendant:
Kristen Harris, Lyndsey Van Buskirk, Cheryl Mabray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Najera v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Christopher Najera
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hernandez Dominguez v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00411
Petitioner:
Gabino Hernandez Dominguez
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Krueger v. Collier
as 5:2024cv00396
Petitioner:
Kent Anthony Krueger
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wheelock v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00416
Petitioner:
Scott Ralph Wheelock
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
