Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Pham et al v. Citimortgage, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv01341
Defendant:
Citimortgage, Inc. , Flagstar Bank, F.S.B. , Southwestern National Bank and others
Plaintiff:
Chan Pham and Cuc Thi Tran
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441
Garza v. First National Bank et al
as 5:2011cv01097
Defendant:
Clear Lake National Bank, First National Bank and Eric D. Sherer
Plaintiff:
Michael Garza
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Wolfe v. Deutsche National Bank Trust Company a/k/a Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
as 4:2011cv03792
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Wolfe
Defendant:
Deutsche National Bank Trust Company a/k/a Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Smith v. Bank of America et al
as 2:2011cv00120
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Smith
Defendant:
Bank of America , Mortgage Electronic Registration System , Morgan Stanley ABS Capital 1 Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Patel v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA et al
as 3:2010cv01417
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA , BAC Home Loan Servicing, LP, Chase Home Finance and others
Plaintiff:
Niva Patel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
M Tee Enterprises, Inc. et al v. Stock Loan Services, LLC et al
as 3:2009cv02044
Plaintiff:
M Tee Enterprises, Inc., Michael Thomas, Rothwell-Myers Limited and others
Defendant:
Stock Loan Services, LLC, Stock Building Supply, Inc., Jim Major and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Khurrum Trading Corporation et al v. Woodforest National Bank et al
as 4:2009cv00134
Plaintiff:
Khurrum Trading Corporation, Muhammad Monga and Zehra Monga
Defendant:
Woodforest National Bank, Tetra Tech Construction Management and Inspection Inc and Abausa LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Pease v. First National Bank et al
as 1:2007cv00199
Plaintiff:
Crae Robert Pease
Defendant:
First National Bank, T. Mark Rogstad, Joe Goodson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
