Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Daigre v. Texas Roadhouse Holdings, LLC, et al
as 2:2016cv02343
Defendant:
Texas Roadhouse Holdings, LLC , William Weinberg, Jeffrey Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Bennie Daigre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williamson v. ARAMARK Schools Facilities, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00118
Defendant:
ARAMARK Schools Facilities, LLC and Bridget Jones
Plaintiff:
Ellen Williamson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Williamson et al v. ARAMARK Schools Facilities, LLC
as 3:2016cv00117
Defendant:
ARAMARK Schools Facilities, LLC
Plaintiff:
Aramark Management Services, LP, Bridget Jones and Ellen Williamson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Daigre v. Texas Roadhouse Holdings, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv01025
Plaintiff:
Sarah Daigre
Defendant:
Texas Roadhouse Holdings, LLC , William Weinberg, Jeffrey Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
White v. Aramark Educational Services LLC
as 3:2016cv00003
Defendant:
Aramark Educational Services L L C
Plaintiff:
Thomasina White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Washington v. Aramark Services, Inc.
as 3:2015cv02522
Plaintiff:
Dionne Washington
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perez v. Aramark Sports & Entertainment Services, LLC
as 4:2015cv01908
Plaintiff:
Rocio Perez
Defendant:
Aramark Sports & Entertainment Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wyman et al v. Brookshire Grocery Co et al
as 3:2015cv01045
Plaintiff:
Nora A Wyman and Christopher Wyman
Defendant:
Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel L L C and Brookshire Grocery Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Aramark Services, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00705
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Russia Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cheney v. ARAMARK Healthcare Support Services, LLC
as 3:2014cv02838
Plaintiff:
Jill Cheney
Defendant:
ARAMARK Healthcare Support Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
