Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Atkinson, Jr. v. Union Pacific Railroad, Individually and as Successor in Interest to Southern Pacific Transporation Company
as 3:2019cv00212
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad, Individually and as Successor in Interest to Southern Pacific Transporation Company
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Garcia Atkinson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Incorrectly Filed Case has been re-filed as 3:19cv00212.
as 4:2019cv02299
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad, Individually and as Successor in Interest to Southern Pacific Transporation Company
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Garcia Atkinson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Hedgecock et al v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
as 3:2018cv00410
Plaintiff:
Everett Norman Moore and Lawrence Hedgecock
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Henry v. Cooper/T. Smith Stevedoring Company, Inc et al
as 2:2016cv02608
Defendant:
Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. , James J. Flanagan Shipping Corporation , Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company and others
Third_party_plaintiff:
Dixie Machine Welding & Metal Works, Inc.
Third_party_defendant:
Claims Resolution Management Corporation
Plaintiff:
Amos Henry , Sharon Henry , Dymous Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Harrison et al v. Port Terminal Railroad Association et al
as 4:2015cv02512
Defendant:
Port Terminal Railroad Association and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Chuck L Harrison , Karen A Cannon and Leon E Harrison
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Leonard et al v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College et al
as 3:2013cv00565
Defendant:
Albemarle Corporation, Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Cessna Aircraft Company and others
Plaintiff:
Beverly Leonard and Royce Leonard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
