Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Joseph v. Phillips 66 Company et al
as 2:2016cv00021
Plaintiff:
Joseph V. Lewis
Defendant:
Phillips 66 Company, Phillips Petroleum Company, Drilling Specialties Company, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herron v. 3M
as 1:2005cv00360
Defendant:
3M, Congoleum Corporation, D.B. Riley, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Emma Herron, Carl Abbott, Larry Donnell Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Herron v. 3M
as 1:2005cv00175
Defendant:
3M, Congoleum Corporation, D.B. Riley, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Emma Herron, Carl Abbott, Larry Donnell Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Covington, et al v. Garlock Sealing, et al
as 3:2003cv00236
Defendant:
Coastal Rubber & Gasket Company, Inc., General Motors Corporation, Mobil Oil Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Henry L. Harris, Jerald Wayne Johnson, Charles Samuel Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Williams, et al v. A.P. Green Ind., et al
as 1:2001cv00213
Plaintiff:
Harry Cecil Burris, Charles Edward Bourn, Donell Smith and others
Defendant:
United States Mineral Products Co., Beazer East, Inc., Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Herring, et al v. Metropolitan Life, et al
as 1:2000cv00486
Plaintiff:
Joe Turner, Billy Joe Peek, James Alton Connally and others
Defendant:
Standard Equipment Company, Inc., Garlock, Inc., CRS, America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Hedrick, et al v. Metropolitan Life, et al
as 1:2000cv00485
Plaintiff:
Betty Ann Smith, Brenda Diane Jones, Sally F. Tharp and others
Defendant:
U.C. Realty Corporation, Armstrong World Industries, Inc., Insulation Contracting, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
