Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Yan v. State Bar of Texas
as 24-10543
Plaintiff:
Conghua Yan
Defendant:
State Bar of Texas, a private company, Barrows Firm, a private company, Leslie Starr Barrows, in Individual Capacity, as Member of the State Bar of Texas and others
Yan v. State Bar of TX
as 24-10036
Plaintiff:
Conghua Yan
Defendant:
State Bar of Texas, a private company, Barrows Firm, a private company, Leslie Starr Barrows, in Individual Capacity, as Member of the State Bar of Texas and others
Yan v. The State Bar of Texas et al
as 4:2023cv00758
Plaintiff:
Conghua Yan
Defendant:
The State Bar of Texas, The Barrow Firm, Leslie Starr Barrow and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Doug Welborn, et al v. Bank of New York Mellon Corp., et al
as 13-30103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUG WELBORN, In His Official Capacity as Clerk of Court of Nineteenth Judicial District for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, Louisiana, MARK J. GRAFFEO, In His Official Capacity as Clerk of Court of the Eighth Judicial District for the Parish of West Baton Rouge, Louisiana, GERALD W HARRINGTON, In His Official Capacity as Clerk of Court of the Thirty-Third Judicial District for the Parish of Allen, Louisiana and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA, CITI MORTGAGE, INCORPORATED and others
El Paso County, Texas et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00705
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Chase Home Mortgage Corporation of the Southeast, CitiMortgage, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Cass County, Texas, El Paso County, Texas, Hidalgo County, Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv03699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
