Cases 11 - 20 of 76
Coronado-Castillo v. Gillis et al
as 5:2018cv00134
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Core Civic Corporation, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Shawn R. Gillis
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Coronado-Castillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Navarrette-Hernandez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2017cv00139
Petitioner:
Wlfrado Navarrette-Hernandez
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Steven D. Julian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Powell v. Banks et al
as 3:2017cv00866
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Powell
Defendant:
Jacqueline Banks , United States Bureau of Prison(s) and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Shults et al
as 3:2017cv00724
Plaintiff:
Arnold-Hamilton Thomas
Defendant:
Larry Shults, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Castro-Alvardo v. Sessions et al
as 5:2017cv00085
Plaintiff:
Juan Castro-Alvardo
Defendant:
Jeff Sessions, U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Burrell v. Martin et al
as 3:2016cv00187
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Lanard Burrell
Defendant:
E. Martin, United States Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Flores v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2014cv00755
Plaintiff:
Alberto Becerra Flores
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tripodis v. Longley et al
as 5:2012cv00111
Plaintiff:
Everett Jerome Tripodis
Defendant:
Archie Longley, Mr. Adan, Mr. Samuels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Goss v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2012cv00072
Plaintiff:
Teffin C. Goss, II
Defendant:
U.S. Bureau of Prisons and Archie Longley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Goss v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2013cv00825
Plaintiff:
Teffin C. Goss, II
Defendant:
U.S. Bureau of Prisons and Archie Longley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
