Cases 31 - 40 of 9,181
Rosario-Colon v. Vannoy
as 2:2024cv00854
Plaintiff:
Walter Rosario-Colon
Defendant:
Darrel Vannoy
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bragg v. Dauzat
as 1:2024cv00433
Plaintiff:
Stephan Tyler Bragg
Defendant:
Michele Dauzat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colon v. Hooper et al
as 2:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
Irwin Gomez Colon
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nunez-Reynoso v. Martinez
as 2:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Agustin Nunez-Reynoso
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lugman v. Cox
as 1:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Abdul K Lugman
Defendant:
J W Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ross v. Day et al
as 2:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
Frederick Ross
Defendant:
Travis Day
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunter v. Dear
as 2:2024cv00702
Plaintiff:
Thomas James Hunter
Defendant:
Warden Dear
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Soto-Martinez v. USA
as 1:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Luis Soto-Martinez
Defendant:
Warden F C I Pollock and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Victor v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
Errol Victor, Sr.
Defendant:
James LeBlanc
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mandigo v. Juvenile Justice
as 5:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mandigo
Defendant:
Office of Juvenile Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
