Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Franklin v. McClure
as 3:2022cv00599
Plaintiff:
Mario Franklin
Defendant:
Marc McClure
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Haley v. Brewer
as 3:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Russell Haley
Defendant:
Franklin Brewer
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boler v. M.D.O.C. et al
as 3:2021cv00826
Plaintiff:
Travis Boler
Defendant:
M.D.O.C., State of Mississippi and Warden Franklin D. Brewer
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stubbs v. Cain et al
as 2:2020cv00106
Plaintiff:
Cornell Stubbs
Defendant:
Burl Cain and Warden Franklin Brewer
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gilmore v. Paul
as 5:2020cv00033
Petitioner:
Franklin Gilmore
Respondent:
Warden David Paul
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Edmonson v. Hood et al
as 2:2017cv00213
Plaintiff:
Kenny Franklin Edmonson
Defendant:
Jim Hood and Stanley R. Sorey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fitzpatrick v. Banks et al
as 3:2016cv00200
Petitioner:
Franklin Fitzpatrick
Respondent:
Jacauelyn Banks and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edmonson v. Sollie
as 3:2014cv00460
Plaintiff:
Kenny Franklin Edmonson
Defendant:
W.O. "Billy" Sollie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edmonson v. Sollie et al
as 3:2014cv00068
Plaintiff:
Kenny Franklin Edmonson
Defendant:
Billy Sollie and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Franklin v. Moore
as 2:2012cv00044
Petitioner:
Stevoris Franklin
Respondent:
James Moore, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
