Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Lewis v. Kelly
as 1:2010cv00313
Plaintiff:
Joseph Samuel Lewis
Defendant:
Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Siddall v. Kelly et al
as 2:2010cv00081
Petitioner:
Derrick Siddall
Respondent:
Lawrence Kelly, Mississippi Department of Corrections and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Womack v. Kelly
as 3:2010cv00131
Plaintiff:
Larry Womack
Defendant:
Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Babb v. Kelly
as 3:2010cv00048
Plaintiff:
Johnny Robert Babb
Defendant:
Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colter v. Kelly et al
as 4:2009cv00170
Plaintiff:
Michael Herbert Colter
Defendant:
Lawrence Kelly, Robert Scott and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turner v. Kelly et al
as 1:2009cv00270
Petitioner:
Clarris Turner
Respondent:
Lawrence Kelly and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Glidden v. Kelly et al
as 1:2009cv00760
Plaintiff:
Gary Allen Glidden
Defendant:
Lawrence Kelly and Robert Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gray v. Kelly
as 2:2009cv00184
Petitioner:
Maurice Gray
Respondent:
Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winters v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2009cv00603
Plaintiff:
Harvey Lee Winters
Defendant:
State of Mississippi and Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SingletonDO NOT FILE v. Kelly
as 4:2009cv00098
Petitioner:
Donnie SingletonDO NOT FILE
Respondent:
Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
