Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Dillon v. Moore et al
as 1:2016cv01699
Plaintiff:
Keith Mark Dillon
Defendant:
Lance Moore, Linus Wilkerson, Ben Otwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Probation & Parole et al
as 5:2016cv01686
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Parks, Sr
Defendant:
Probation & Parole and Lenord Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Tool City et al
as 2:2016cv14052
Plaintiff:
Scott Boatner Pierce
Defendant:
Tool City, Tool Police Department, Henderson County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Kaufman County District Attorney Office et al
as 2:2016cv13830
Plaintiff:
Scott Boatner Pierce
Defendant:
Kaufman County District Attorney Office, Kaufman County, Adult Probation Office Kaufman County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Ranatza et al
as 3:2015cv00590
Plaintiff:
Emile Pierce
Defendant:
Jenie Powers and Sheryl Ranatza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuels v. Pierce et al
as 5:2013cv01577
Plaintiff:
Ontario Samuels
Defendant:
Leonard Pierce, William Tuggle, Steve Prator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McLin v. Livingston Parish Sheriff Department et al
as 3:2013cv00336
Defendant:
Jenifer Gomez, Livingston Parish Sheriff Department and Alden Thomaston
Plaintiff:
Leslie Shaine Pierce H McLin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson-Dewar V. Childress et al
as 2:2011cv01502
Plaintiff:
Chadworth Robertson-Dewar
Defendant:
R Childress, Marne Boyle, Tech Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Collins v. Caddo Parish et al
as 5:2009cv01514
Plaintiff:
Ricky Collins
Defendant:
Sheriffs Office of Caddo Parish, Leonard Pierce and Tuddle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. May et al
as 3:2009cv01512
Plaintiff:
Cyrus Pierce
Defendant:
Steven May, Fredrick, Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
