Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Codec Technologies LLC v. Craig Electronics, Inc.
as 2:2016cv01426
Plaintiff:
Codec Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Craig Electronics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Neal Technologies, Inc. v. Maryland Performance Diesel LLC
as 4:2016cv00643
Plaintiff:
Neal Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Maryland Performance Diesel LLC and Craig A Briggs, Jr
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Motile Optics, LLC v. Craig Electronics, Inc.
as 6:2015cv01072
Plaintiff:
Motile Optics, LLC
Defendant:
Craig Electronics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Orr v. Canon U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01171
Plaintiff:
James Craig Orr
Defendant:
Canon U.S.A., Inc., I.R.I.S. Inc. and Canon Europa N.V.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
CFN International LP et al v. Sevea International, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00126
Plaintiff:
CFN International LP and Elan Global, Inc.
Defendant:
Sevea International, Inc., Michael Macris, Jerry D. Saxton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
NLS Global LP et al v. Sevea International, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00099
Plaintiff:
NLS Global LP and VSN Global, Inc.
Defendant:
Sevea International, Inc., Michael Macris, Jerry D. Saxton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
800 Adept Inc v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company et al
as 5:2007cv00057
Plaintiff:
800 Adept Inc, 800 Adept Inc, 800 Adept Inc and others
Defendant:
Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company, Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company, McLeodUSA Inc and others
Counter Claimant:
Vail Systems Inc, Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Domino's Pizza LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
800 Adept Inc, 800 Adept Inc, 800 Adept Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
L&H Concepts LLC v. Craig A Smith et al
as 6:2007cv00065
Plaintiff:
L&H Concepts LLC, L&H Concepts LLC and L&H Concepts LLC
Defendant:
Craig A Schmidt, Craig A Schmidt, Craig A Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
