Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Concours Paint & Body Inc v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company et al
as 3:2015cv04012
Plaintiff:
Concours Paint & Body Inc
Defendant:
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Parrott Oil Corporation, GSC Commercial & Industrial Properties Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Everett et al v. Tram Chemicals, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv03451
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Everett , Mike Kowis , Michael James Kowis and others
Defendant:
Tram Chemicals, Inc., Walden Environmental Chemistries, Inc., Walden Performance Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
The Dow Chemical Company et al v. Anglers E & C, Inc., f/k/a Fish Engineering & Construction, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00387
Plaintiff:
The Dow Chemical Company , Gulfco Restoration Group , Chromalloy American LLC and others
Defendant:
Anglers E & C, Inc., FECP, Ltd., Allied Marine Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613
Duyn et al v. Cameron International Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00183
Plaintiff:
Stacey Van Duyn , Charles Knight and Margaret Ann Brame
Defendant:
Cameron International Corporation, BP, plc, BP Products North America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Daniels v. Cameron International Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00182
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Daniels
Defendant:
Cameron International Corporation, BP, plc, BP Products North America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Staley v. Cameron International Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00181
Plaintiff:
Jessica Staley
Defendant:
Cameron International Corporation, BP, plc, BP Products North America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nguyen et al v. Transocean, Ltd. et al
as 1:2010cv00178
Plaintiff:
Charlie C. Nguyen and Bihn Van Nguyen
Defendant:
Transocean, Ltd., Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc., Transocean Deepwater, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
