Cases 1 - 10 of 34
City of Terrell Texas v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 3:2024cv00974
Plaintiff:
City of Terrell Texas
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, Rural Utilities Service and Rose Hill Special Utility District
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Phillips v. TX Attorney General
as 23-10924
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Deloris Phillips
Defendant / Appellee:
Texas Attorney General Public Information Office and City Attorney Office of Garland Texas
Ondrusek v. United States Army Corps
as 23-10892
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Timpy Ondrusek and Barbara Ann Ondrusek Wolfe
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Jonathan S. Stover, District Commander, Fort Worth District, US Corps of Engineers and City of Dallas
Phillips v. Texas Attorney General Public Information Office et al
as 3:2023cv01860
Plaintiff:
Deloris Phillips
Defendant:
Texas Attorney General Public Information Office and City Attorney Office of Garland Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Alliance Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA
as 23-10362
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Janet Woodcock, M.D., in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration and others
Intervenor:
Danco Laboratories, L.L.C.
Amicus Curiae:
State of New York, Ethics and Public Policy Center, Local Governments and others
Not Classified By Court:
240 Members of Congress and Human Coalition
American Farm Bureau Federation et al v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 3:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
American Farm Bureau Federation, American Petroleum Institute, American Road and Transportation Builders Association and others
Defendant:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Michael S. Regan, United States Army Corps Of Engineers and others
Petitioner:
Bayou City Waterkeeper
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Texas et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 3:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
STATE OF TEXAS, Texas Commission On Environmental Quality, Railroad Commission of Texas and others
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Michael Regan, United States Army Corps Of Engineers and others
Petitioner:
Bayou City Waterkeeper
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Bayou City v. US Army Corps
as 22-40770
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bayou City Waterkeeper
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Lieutenant General Scott A. Spellmon, in his official capacity as Chief and Commander of Engineers, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Colonel Timothy R. Vail, in his official capacity as District Engineer, Galveston District, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
VanDerStok v. Garland
as 22-11086
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G. Andren, Tactical Machining, L.L.C., a limited liability company and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Blackhawk Manufacturing Group, Incorporated, doing business as 80 Percent Arms
Defendant / Appellant:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Amicus Curiae:
District of Columbia, Brady, 16 Major Cities and others
VanDerStok v. Garland
as 22-11071
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jennifer VanDerStok, Michael G. Andren, Tactical Machining, L.L.C., a limited liability company and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, Department of Justice, Steven Dettelbach, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Amicus Curiae:
District of Columbia, Brady, State of New Jersey and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
