Cases 41 - 50 of 141
The Mississippi Bar v. Johnson
as 3:2020ad00006
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander, Porfi Stokes and others
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Richard Vaughn Johnson, Jr.
The Mississippi Bar v. Byrd
as 3:2020ad00005
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander, Porfi Stokes and others
Respondent:
Sibyl Caver Byrd
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Get Glam Beauty, LLC v. Stewart et al
as 3:2020cv00580
Defendant:
Lynn Fitch, Dorothy Ennis, Hilda Bills and others
Plaintiff:
Karrece Stewart and Get Glam Beauty, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Mississippi Bar v. Walker
as 3:2020ad00004
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander, Porfi Stokes and others
Respondent:
Randolph Walker
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
The Mississippi Bar v. Mauk-Williams
as 3:2020ad00003
Respondent:
Charlene Mauk-Williams
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander, Porfi Stokes and others
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
The Mississippi Bar v. Abioto
as 3:2020ad00002
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander, Porfi Stokes and others
Respondent:
Wanda X. Abioto
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Criswell v. Lumumba et al
as 3:2020cv00294
Defendant:
Chokwe Antar Lumumba and City of Jackson, Mississippi
Plaintiff:
Dana Criswell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Mississippi Bar v. Cotton
as 3:2020ad00001
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Katherine Alexander, Porfi Stokes and others
Respondent:
Ramel L. Cotton
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Harris v. Anthony, et al
as 3:2020cv00120
Defendant:
Dr. Dwalia S. South, Dr. Thad Waites, Wheeler Timothy Timbs, III and others
Plaintiff:
Donna Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conner v. Alltin LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00057
Defendant:
The State of Mississippi, Kevin Casteel, Alltin LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Samantha Conner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
