Cases 11 - 20 of 24
MCI Communications Services Inc et al v. Central Scott Telephone Company et al
as 3:2015cv00019
Plaintiff:
MCI Communications Services Inc and Verizon Select Services Inc
Defendant:
Central Scott Telephone Company , Centurytel of Chester Inc , Centurytel of Postville Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 206
Cemex, Inc. et al v. Mast et al
as 4:2014cv02970
Plaintiff:
Cemex, Inc. and CEMEX, Inc. Benefits Committee
Defendant:
Chester Mast, Betty Richards, William R. Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
Tilling, et al v. Chester Roberts Services, Inc., et al
as 4:2013cv00549
Defendant:
Chester Roberts Services, Inc. and Global Radial Aircraft Engines Inc
Plaintiff:
John Tilling and Simon Tilling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Robinson
as 3:2012cv04255
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Chester E. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv03902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080 Student Loan Recovery
Hayes v. Jones
as 3:2011cv02380
Plaintiff:
Harry A Hayes
Defendant:
Chester Clay Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cary v. Fidelity National Insurance Company et al
as 3:2010cv00625
Plaintiff:
Chester Cary
Defendant:
Lewis Robinson, Mike Prescott, Texas Windstorm Insurance Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv05148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv04505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv03327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
