Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Mary Kay Inc v. Ayon et al
as 3:2017cv00484
Plaintiff:
Mary Kay Inc
Defendant:
Arturo Ayon and John Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Bravado International Group Merchandising Services, Inc. v. Does 1-100 et al
as 4:2017cv00005
Plaintiff:
Bravado International Group Merchandising Services, Inc.
Defendant:
John Does 1-100, Jane Does 1-100 and XYZ Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc.
as 4:2016cv03552
Plaintiff:
Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc.
Defendant:
Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software, Inc. v. Does 1-100
as 4:2016cv01422
Plaintiff:
Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software, Inc.
Defendant:
Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Araca Merchandise, L.P. v. Does 1-100 et al
as 4:2016cv01194
Plaintiff:
Araca Merchandise, L.P.
Defendant:
John Does 1-100, Jane Does 1-100 and XYZ Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
James Avery Craftsman, Inc. v. Flores et al
as 5:2015cv00959
Defendant:
Jin Choi, Steve Cobb, Dong Cui and others
Plaintiff:
James Avery Craftsman, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software, Inc.
as 4:2015cv00582
Plaintiff:
Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software, Inc.
Defendant:
Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc.
as 4:2015cv00017
Plaintiff:
Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc.
Defendant:
Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
F.E.A., Inc. v. Does 1-100 et al
as 4:2014cv01432
Plaintiff:
F.E.A., Inc.
Defendant:
John Does 1-100, Jane Does 1-100 and XYZ Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
F.E.A., Inc. v. Does 1-100 et al
as 4:2014cv01389
Plaintiff:
F.E.A., Inc.
Defendant:
John Does 1-100, Jane Does 1-100 and XYZ Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
