Cases 141 - 150 of 189,456
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Leday et al v. CarMax Business Services, LLC D/B/A CarMax Auto Finance
as 4:2024cv01804
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Leday
Defendant:
CarMax Business Services, LLC D/B/A CarMax Auto Finance
Cross Defendant:
DLT Recovery LLC dba Hooked Recovery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
VariChem International, Inc v. Riddle's Delhi & Chemical Service Co, Inc et al
as 4:2024cv01784
Plaintiff:
VariChem International, Inc
Defendant:
Riddle's Delhi & Chemical Service Co, Inc doing business as E&P Services Group, Pig Sweep LLC doing business as E&P Services Group and James A Allred, JR
Edwards v. David Weekley Homes, LLC
as 4:2024cv01783
Plaintiff:
Jacob Edwards
Defendant:
David Weekly Homes, LLC
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Lain v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 3:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Kim Lain
Defendant:
U.S. Department Of Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Ortega v. Sienna Marketing & Consulting Inc.,
as 5:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Mark Ortega
Defendant:
Sienna Marketing & Consulting Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Chavez v. Rebuilt Brokerage LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Ananda Camargo Chavez
Defendant:
Rebuilt Brokerage LLC doing business as Rebuilt Realty and Rebuilt Offers LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Texas Assoc of Bcasts v. FCC
as 24-60226
Petitioner:
Texas Association of Broadcasters
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
