Cases 11 - 20 of 56
Compton v. McDonald et al
as 4:2020cv01222
Plaintiff:
Jason Compton
Defendant:
William A Hudson, Jr and Robert McDonald
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00511
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02271
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
McDonald v. Sarma Collections, Inc. et al
as 6:2019cv00375
Defendant:
Equifax Information Services, LLC and Sarma Collections, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Victor McDonald
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Daiquiri with a Twist, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv00538
Defendant:
Lester R. McDonald, Jr., Shikeitha V. McDonald and Daiquiri with a Twist, LLC
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. and Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Liverman v. McMurray et al
as 7:2019cv00062
Defendant:
Larry Don Kish, David Gibson, Lindsey Sheguit and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Liverman
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Kimbrell et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00064
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Lowrance, Martha Maroon, Jacob Mills and others
Defendant:
FCA US LLC, VM North America Inc, Robert Bosch GmbH and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
McDonald, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Nationwide Recovery Systems, Ltd. and John Does 1-25
as 6:2018cv00480
Defendant:
Nationwide Recovery Systems, Ltd. and John Does 1-25
Plaintiff:
Amber McDonald, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America v. McDonald
as 4:2018mc02160
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Jennifer McDonald
United States of America v. McDonald
as 4:2018mc02162
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Matthew G. McDonald
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
