Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Coleman v. Sterling Backcheck
as 4:2014cv02508
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Coleman
Defendant:
Sterling Backcheck
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv02194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hickman v. Greenblatt et al
as 4:2014mc00837
Petitioner:
Kenneth Hickman
Respondent:
William Greenblatt, Sterling Global Background Checks and Sterling Infosystem
Sterling Shipyard, LP v. CGBM 100, LLC
as 1:2014cv00193
Petitioner:
Sterling Shipyard, LP
Respondent:
CGBM 100, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv02006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv01479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Thomas v. Miramar Lakes Homeowners Association et al
as 4:2013mc00941
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Thomas
Defendant:
Miramar Lakes Homeowners Association, Sterling Association Services Inc and The Law Offices of Michael O'Neal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Lee Financial Corporation et al v. Witkin et al
as 3:2012cv04501
Plaintiff:
Lee Financial Corporation , Richard R Lee, Jr and Mary Teresa Quinn
Defendant:
Jack A. Witkin, Jack Witkin Generation Skipping Trust, Jack A Witkin IRA Sterling Trust FBO Jack Witkin and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
United States of America v. Harris et al
as 3:2012cv02133
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Sterling Wesley Harris
Garnishee:
Savings Board of the NFL Player Second Career
Cause Of Action: Application for a Writ of Garnishment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
