Cases 31 - 40 of 784
National Association of Blind Merchants et al v. The Army & Air Force Exchange Service et al
as 3:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
National Association of Blind Merchants, Alicia Morris, Edgar Mendez and others
Defendant:
The Army & Air Force Exchange Service, Tom Shull, in his official capacity as Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Army & Air Force Exchange Service, Christine Wormuth, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Army and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Arnesen v. Raimondo
as 24-60055
Plaintiff:
Karen Bell, A.P. Bell Fish Company, Inc., William Copeland and others
Defendant:
Gina Raimondo, Secretary, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Marine Fisheries Service, Janet Coit, NMFS Assistant Administrator and others
Amicus Curiae:
Cato Institute
Al Kayyali et al v. Johnson et al
as 4:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
ZUHA AL KAYYALI, Malka Hamad and AYAD ALGAYYALI
Defendant:
Lisa Johnson, Alamdar Hamdani, Dos and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Su v. Cactus Canyon
as 24-50031
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor
Defendant:
Cactus Canyon Quarries, Incorporated and Jack Andy Carson
Jefferson Parish v. Chevron
as 24-30023
Plaintiff:
Jefferson Parish
Intervenor:
Louisiana State, ex rel, Jeff Landry, Attorney General and Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management, Thomas F. Harris, Secretary
Defendant:
Chevron USA, Incorporated
Jefferson Parish v. Chevron
as 24-30022
Plaintiff:
Jefferson Parish
Intervenor:
Louisiana State, ex rel, Jeff Landry, Attorney General and Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management, Thomas F. Harris, Secretary
Defendant:
Chevron USA, Incorporated and Chevron USA Holdings, Incorporated, As successor in interest to Texaco, Incorporated
Plaquemines Parish v. Chevron
as 24-30028
Plaintiff:
Plaquemines Parish
Intervenor:
Louisiana State, ex rel. Jeff Landry, Attorney General and Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management, Thomas F. Harris, Secretary
Defendant:
Chevron USA, Incorporated and Chevron USA, Incorporated, as successor in interest to Gulf Oil Corporation and the California Company
Plaquemines Parish v. Chevron
as 24-30030
Plaintiff:
Plaquemines Parish
Intervenor:
Louisiana State, ex rel. Jeff Landry, Attorney General and Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management, Thomas F. Harris, Secretary
Defendant:
Chevron USA, Incorporated, as successor in interest to the California Company and Chevron Oil Company and Chevron U.S.A. Holdings, Incorporated, as successor in interest to Texaco Incorporated
Jefferson Parish v. Chevron
as 24-30031
Plaintiff:
Jefferson Parish and Louisiana State, ex rel, Parish of Jefferson
Intervenor:
Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management, Thomas F. Harris, Secretary and Louisiana State, ex rel, Jeff Landry, Attorney General
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A. Holdings, Incorporated, as successor in interest to Texaco E&P Inc. and Texaco Inc., Chevron USA, Incorporated, as successor in interest to The California Company, Atlantic Richfield Company, in its own capacity and as successor in interest to Acro Oil and Gas Company-Division of Atlantic Richfield and others
Plaquemines Parish v. Chevron
as 24-30032
Plaintiff:
Plaquemines Parish and Louisiana State, ex rel, Parish of Plaquemines
Intervenor:
Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management and its Secretary, Thomas F. Harris and Louisiana State, ex rel, Jeff Landry, Attorney General
Defendant:
Chevron USA, Incorporated, in its own capacity and as successor in interest to Chevron Oil Company and the California Company, Chevron USA Holdings, Incorporated, as successor in interest to Texaco E & P, Incorporated and Texaco, Incorporated, Texas Company and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
