Cases 41 - 50 of 74
USA v. Steve Garner
as 14-30930
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
STEVE J. GARNER
USA v. Raymond Shoemaker, et al
as 14-60536
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND LAMONT SHOEMAKER, also known as Ray Shoemaker and EARNEST LEVI GARNER, JR., also known as Lee Garner
State of Texas, et al v. Roy Crabtree, et al
as 13-40819
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, JIMMY GARNER and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ROY E. CRABTREE, In His Official Capacity as the Regional Administrator of the National Marine Fisheries Service, ALAN D. RISENHOOVER, In His Official Capacity as the National Marine Service Director of the Sustainable Fisheries performing the functions and duties of the Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, PENNY PRITZKER, In Her Official Capacity as United States Secretary of Commerce and others
Garner et al v. The United States Of America et al -
as 3:2013cv00149
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Garner , Robert Marc Wilkerson , William Atkins and others
Defendant:
The United States Of America , Rebecca Blank and Samuel Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422 Appeal from Administrative Decision
State of Texas et al v. Crabtree et al
as 1:2013cv00070
Defendant:
Roy E Crabtree , Alan D Risenhoover , Rebecca Blank and others
Plaintiff:
State Of Texas and State of Louisiana
Consol_plaintiff:
Jimmy Garner , Robert Marc Wilkerson , William Atkins and others
Consol_defendant:
The United States Of America and Samuel Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. Kinte Garner
as 13-40186
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KINTE VANNESS GARNER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
