Cases 41 - 50 of 412
Incorrectly Filed Do not docket in 4:22cv00167. Case has been re-filed as 4:22mc00201.
as 4:2022cv00167
Respondent:
Jessica Robinson
Petitioner:
HouTax East LP, HouTax West Ventures GP, LLC, HouTax West, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ahiara Development Group USA, Inc. v. C.H. Robinson et al
as 4:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Ahiara Development Group USA, Inc.
Defendant:
C.H. Robinson d/b/a Freightquote.com, TForce Freight, Inc. and C.H. Robinson doing business as Freightquote.com
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Robinson
as 22-30014
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Clarence Robinson, Jr.
USA v. Robinson
as 22-30011
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Clarence Robinson
USA v. Robinson
as 22-30005
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Clarence Robinson, Jr., also known as Rocky Dwayne Perkins
USA v. Robinson
as 22-30004
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Clarence Robinson, Jr., also known as Clarence Robertson
GPS Coatings LLC et al v. Jaddou et al
as 4:2021cv04172
Plaintiff:
GPS Coatings LLC, Andrea Bressan, Lucia Regina Pereira Bulgaris Bressan and others
Defendant:
Ur M. JADDOU, Lauren K Miller and Terri Robinson
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
USA v. Robinson
as 21-20636
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Bernard Robinson
Robinson v. The DeGrasse Law Firm, P.C.
as 4:2021cv01320
Plaintiff:
Judy Ann Robinson
Defendant:
The DeGrasse Law Firm, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Robinson-Williams v. C H G Hospital
as 21-30659
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Margie Robinson-Williams
Defendant / Appellee:
C H G Hospital West Monroe, L.L.C., doing business as Cornerstone Specialty Hospitals West Monroe
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
