Cases 61 - 70 of 84
USA v. David Monte
as 11-10028
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID MONTES
USA v. Monte Armstrong
as 10-41350
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MONTE LEE ARMSTRONG, also known as Monte Armstrong
USA v. Cesar Montes-Sala
as 10-41167
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CESAR OMAR MONTES-SALAS
USA v. Cesar Duran-Monte
as 10-50830
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CESAR DURAN-MONTES
USA v. Rogelio Lopez-Monte
as 10-50780
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROGELIO LOPEZ-MONTES
USA v. Ermi Beccerra-Morale
as 10-50778
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ERMI ARNOLDO BECCERRA-MORALES, also known as Juan Alonso Montes-Torres
USA v. Jose Juarez-Monte
as 10-50710
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE UBALDO JUAREZ-MONTES, also known as Jose Beltran-Montes
USA v. Florencio Montes-Linare
as 10-40176
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FLORENCIO MONTES-LINARES
Davis-Lynch Inc v. Moreno et al
as 4:2010cv00087
Plaintiff:
Davis- Lynch
Defendant:
Nancy Moreno, Jose Alfredo Moreno, Jose Alfredo Moreno, dba Hanna-Skye and Accurate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Ruby Robinson Company, Inc. v. Kalil Fresh Marketing, Inc., et al
as 09-20754
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RUBY ROBINSON COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUN VALLEY PRODUCE COMPANY, INC. and CLASSIC SALADS, L.L.C.
Defendant - Appellee:
KALIL FRESH MARKETING INCORPORATED, doing business as Houston's Finest Produce Company, JOHN KALIL, BRYAN HERR and others
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellee:
C. H. ROBINSON COMPANY, DEL MONTE FRESH PRODUCE, AMEGY BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Movant - Appellee:
MAGNOLIA FRUIT & PRODUCE COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.