Cases 61 - 70 of 197
Christopher Eaton, et al v. Brent Stroman, et al
as 20-50032
Defendant / Appellant:
DETECTIVE JEFFREY ROGERS, in his individual capacity, DETECTIVE MANUEL CHAVEZ, in his individual capacity, ASSISTANT CHIEF ROBERT LANNING, in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER EATON, JAMES VENABLE and OWEN BARTLETT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Owen Crawford, Sr. v. Child Protective Services, et al
as 19-20760
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OWEN KEITH CRAWFORD, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES
Siria Estrada-Zambreno, et al v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 19-60852
Petitioner:
SIRIA ROSARIO ESTRADA-ZAMBRENO, MARBELLA GUADALUPE RAMOS-ESTRADA, OWEN GERARDO CRUZ-ESTRADA and others
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rodney Hood v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 19-40766
Defendant / Appellee:
BRANT COLLIER, Executive Director, OWEN MURRAY, Vice President, KING WARDEN COMSTOCK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODNEY DALE HOOD
USA v. Ernest Owens, Jr.
as 19-10880
Defendant / Appellant:
ERNEST HOWARD OWENS, JR., also known as "E"
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Jason Owens
as 19-30755
Defendant / Appellant:
JASON LOUIS OWENS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mongo Williams v. John Becraft, et al
as 19-40548
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN BECRAFT, MICHAEL OWENS and SHERRY ST. PE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MONGO J. WILLIAMS
Lowell Green v. USA, et al
as 19-50549
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE ROBERT L. PITMAN, Western District of Texas, BRANTLEY STARR, KEN PAXTON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOWELL QUINCY GREEN
Mongo Williams v. John Becraft
as 19-40613
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN BECRAFT, MICHAEL OWENS and SHERRY ST. PE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MONGO J. WILLIAMS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
