Cases 61 - 70 of 3,610
Mackey v. Airbnb, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00582
Plaintiff:
Shawn Mackey
Defendant:
Airbnb, Inc. and Pamela Fohler
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Harrison v. Goss et al
as 1:2023cv00152
Plaintiff:
Marco V. Harrison, Jr.
Defendant:
Phill Goss and Wilmington Trust, National Association
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 FDIC: Corporate Powers
BluRoc, LLC et al v. Foberg et al
as 2:2023cv00163
Plaintiff:
BluRoc, LLC and Yak Access, LLC
Defendant:
Benjamin Foberg, Justin Lavoie and John Does 1-15
Sunteck Transport Co., LLC et al v. Reynolds
as 1:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Sunteck Transport Co., LLC and Broker Holdings Company, LLC
Defendant:
Anna Reynolds
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
McPhail v. Lynchard
as 4:2023cv00174
Plaintiff:
Beau McPhail
Defendant:
Percy L. Lynchard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Heirs at Law of Eloise Banks et al v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Heirs at Law of Eloise Banks and Darrell O'Neal Banks
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC doing business as Mr. Cooper and Newrez, LLC doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
The Mississippi Bar v. Sheppard
as 3:2023ad00004
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Felisha Anne Sheppard
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
