Cases 71 - 80 of 209
Lasques Prudhomme v. Jay Russell, et al
as 19-30071
Defendant / Appellee:
RAY HANSON, Warden, incorrectly named as Warden Ray Henson, DONNA NORMAN, Medical Director, WILLIAM K. MCCONNELL, Owner and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LASQUES VASQUES PRUDHOMME, on behalf of Brandon Jamal Reed
Bert Villa v. Donna McKinney, et al
as 19-50014
Respondent / Appellee:
DONNA KAY MCKINNEY, GRAND JURY OF THE BEXAR COUNTY COURT HOUSE and LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Petitioner / Appellant:
BERT VILLA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02459
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00928
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Tao et al
as 4:2017cv03678
Plaintiff:
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
James C Tao and Donna Boyd (f/k/a Donna Chen)
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv00236
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jaime Roa v. City of Denison, et al
as 17-41168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAIME JAMES ROA
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF DENISON, JARED JOHNSON, Mayor, JUD REX, City Manager and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv00219
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv00221
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
