Cases 81 - 90 of 120
Figueroa v. Commissioner of the Social Security Adminsitration DO NOT DOCKET IN 2:10MC73. ENTRIES SHOULD BE MADE IN THE RELATED CIVIL CASE.
as 2:2010mc00073
Plaintiff:
Gerardo G. Figueroa
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Pointer v. Social Security Administration et al
as 4:2010mc00491
Plaintiff:
Darryl Wayne Pointer
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Attorney General Of The United States and United States Attorney
Dickerson v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2010cv00795
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Dickerson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Evans v. Social Security Administration et al.
as 4:2010mc00383
Plaintiff:
Michael K Evans
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Michael J Astrue
Mapp v. Social Security Administration.
as 4:2010mc00372
Plaintiff:
Vivian Mapp
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cabrera v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2010mc00045
Plaintiff:
Willie Joe Cabrera
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
McGennis v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2010mc00033
Plaintiff:
Michael H. McGennis
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Noey v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 6:2010cv00228
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Thomas Noey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Alaffa v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration DO NOT DOCKET IN (Miscellaneous Case No. M-10-15). ENTRIES SHOULD BE MADE IN THE RELATED CIVIL CASE
as 7:2010mc00015
Plaintiff:
Jesus Alaffa
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Sanchez v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 7:2010mc00012
Plaintiff:
Isabel Sanchez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
