Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Sanchez v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC
as 1:2022cv00355
Plaintiff:
Alberto Sanchez
Defendant:
Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
USA v. Alberto Sanchez-Avile
as 16-40078
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ALBERTO SANCHEZ-AVILES
USA v. Jose Sanchez-Garcia
as 16-40001
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE ALBERTO SANCHEZ-GARCIA, also known as Jose Alberto Sanchez-Diaz, also known as Ramon Diaz-Carrillo
USA v. Alberto Sanchez Sid
as 15-51153
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ALBERTO SANCHEZ SID
Steck v. Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv02129
Plaintiff:
Richard Steck
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc. , Thomas G. Dundon , Jason Kulas and others
Movant:
Patrick Benard , Deka Investment GmbH and City of Dearborn Heights Act 345 Police & Fire Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities
USA v. Alberto Sanchez-Ramo
as 15-20033
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ALBERTO SANCHEZ-RAMOS, also known as Ramos Alberto Sancez, also known as Alberto Ramos Sanchez
Kumar v. Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv03746
Plaintiff:
Karan Kumar and City of Dearborn Heights Act 345 Police & Fire Retirement System
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc. , Thomas G. Dundon , Jason A. Kulas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
USA v. Soto-Martinez
as 08-50734
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FRANCISCO JAVIER SOTO-MARTINEZ, also known as Javier Soto, also known as Alberto Sanchez, also known as Javier Martinez-Ramirez, also known as Antonio Soto Martinez, also known as Alberto Cantara, also known as Alberto Alcantara Sanchez, also known as Fer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
