Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Terrell v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Eli Terrell, Armando Aguilar, Michael Arroyo and others
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00721
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Feds for Medical Freedom v. Biden
as 22-40043
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Feds for Medical Freedom, Local 918, American Federation of Government Employees, Highland Engineering, Incorporated and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States, United States of America, Department of Transportation and others
Amicus Curiae:
America First Legal Foundation, 45 Members of Congress, 57 Members of Congress and others
USA v. McLaughlin
as 21-10692
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Waymon Scott McLaughlin
McLaughlin v. CN Associates
as 21-20325
Defendant / Appellee:
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Incorporated and CN Associates, Incorporated
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kevin McLaughlin
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01459
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Christopher McLaughlin
as 20-10559
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER WADE MCLAUGHLIN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rachui v. Rachui et al
as 5:2018cv01315
Defendant:
Mary Elizabeth McLaughlin and Miranda Rachui
Plaintiff:
Tyler Matthew Rachui
Cause Of Action: 50 U.S.C. § 3937
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv01236
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
USA v. Waymon McLaughlin
as 17-10915
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WAYMON SCOTT MCLAUGHLIN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
