Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Williams
as 21-20528
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Huey P. Williams, Jr.
Bentler v. Exxon Mobile Corporation et al
as 3:2021cv00335
Defendant:
Neil A Chapman, Exxon Mobile Corporation, Jeffrey J Woodbury and others
Plaintiff:
Martin J Bentler, Amalgamated Bank and State of Rhode Island
Petitioner:
Steven J. Rando
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mark Tennyson v. Harris County Texas, et al
as 19-20556
Defendant / Appellant:
E. VILLARREAL, M. ALSTON, JOASH BUTLER and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARK TENNYSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv04703
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Huey Williams, Jr.
as 16-20356
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
HUEY P. WILLIAMS, JR.
USA v. Huey Williams, Jr.
as 15-20713
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
HUEY P. WILLIAMS, JR.
Betty Bridgewater, et al v. Double Diamond Inc, et al
as 11-90020
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
BETTY BRIDGEWATER, Individually and on behalf of a Class of All Others Similarly Situated and JEFFREY P. WILLIAMS, Individually and on behalf of a Class of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant - Respondent:
DOUBLE DIAMOND INC, R. MIKE WARD, FRED CURRAN and others
Kenneth Williams v. W & T Offshore, Incorporated
as 10-35
Plaintiff - Respondent:
KENNETH P. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Petitioner:
W & T OFFSHORE INC
Bridgewater et al v. Double Diamond Inc et al
as 3:2009cv01758
Plaintiff:
Betty Bridgewater, Betty Bridgewater, Betty Bridgewater and others
Defendant:
Double Diamond-Delaware Inc, Double Diamond Inc, R Mike Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
