Other Statutes Cases filed in Mississippi
Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00394
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03110
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03006
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Turner v. Sweetwater Franchise Group, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00074
Plaintiff: Andrea Turner
Defendant: Sweetwater Franchise Group, LLC and Alford, Holloway, & Smith, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00485
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00477
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00358
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Smith-Garcia v. Atwood et al
as 3:2023cv00058
Plaintiff: David Smith-Garcia
Defendant: Emmett Ray Atwood and David Garland Atwood
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
The Mississippi Bar v. Smith
as 3:2022ad00005
Plaintiff: The Mississippi Bar
Respondent: Latisha R. Smith
Interested Party: Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00149
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?