Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Incorrectly Filed
as 7:2023cv00322
Plaintiff:
Carolina Silva and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores of Texas, L.L.C., Wal-Mart Stores of Texas, L.L.C. D/B/A Wal-Mart #3886, Wal-Mart Stores of Texas, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2022cv00554
Defendant:
Monica Martinez Espinoza, WAL-MART STORES TEXAS, LLC and Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores East
as 21-60864
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Chakakhan R. Davis
Defendant / Appellee:
Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2021cv03188
Plaintiff:
Linda Dornes and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
O'Connor v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas
as 21-40609
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rudolph O'Connor
Defendant / Appellee:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, L.L.C.
Agbonzee v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas
as 21-20395
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tenneh Agbonzee
Defendant / Appellee:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, L.L.C. #772 and Wal-Mart Stores Texas, L.L.C.
Mohammad Reza Tavoosi Mahyari v. Walmart Stores Inc et al
as 3:2021cv01653
Not Classified By Court:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Respondent:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Claimant:
MOHAMMAD REZA TOOVSI MAHYARI
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, Wal-Mart Associates Inc and Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
savage v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 3:2021xc01521
Respondent:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores Inc
Petitioner:
ervie savage
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Poon-Atkins v. Sappington
as 21-60467
Defendant / Appellee:
Sammy M. Sappington and Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christy Poon-Atkins
Huynh v. Walmart
as 21-20277
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thalia Huynh and Dalena Bustos
Defendant / Appellee:
Walmart Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores Texas, L.L.C.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
